Template:Did you know nominations/Parvulastra vivipara

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Parvulastra vivipara

edit

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:04, 14 March 2018 (UTC).

  • General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: 5* expanded, fascinating tiny starfish with great hook, true to source(appears as a reputable blog). Proposed hook is fine. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I came to promote this, but the hook appears to be cited to a blog. What makes echinoblog.blogspot.co.uk a reliable source? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: I am not familiar with the subject, but I am assuming it's a reputable blog as it's being operated by Christopher L. Mah, an expert in this field and a research collaborator for the Smithsonian Institution. Pinging Cwmhiraeth for better explanation. Alex Shih (talk) 15:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: Indeed, and if you look at the foot of this page you will see that he is the expert used by the World Register of Marine Species to confirm the taxonomy of echinoderms. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
As the issue appears to be settled, I am going to tick this again. Alex Shih (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)