Template:Did you know nominations/Partition Sejm

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Partition Sejm

edit

Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 18:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Well-written all-around. Dahn (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Proper and verified. Dahn (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Balanced and informative. Dahn (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC) Should be striking to anyone in Europe, at least. Dahn (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Dahn (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)