- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Partisan Congress riots
- ... that one of the men who robbed František Hoffmann's apartment during the Partisan Congress riots left behind his Czechoslovak Medal of Merit?
- ALT1:... that the Czechoslovak authorities denied that partisans were responsible for the Partisan Congress riots, instead blaming Hungarians and "reactionary elements"?
- ALT2:... that the Slovak authorities suspended restitution to Holocaust survivors after the Partisan Congress riots because many partisans were unhappy returning property that they had obtained to the original Jewish owners?
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 06:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC).
New enough. Long enough. Sourced. Can you please source the hooks? --evrik (talk) 04:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Evrik, As it says in the article, Bumová 2007, p. 18. for ALT0, Bumová 2007, pp. 23–24. for ALT1 (this is also discussed in several other sources), and see Bumová 2007, p. 21. and Cichopek 2014, pp. 105–106. for ALT2. buidhe 14:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe It is customary to add a citation behind your hook. Please do so, I don't read Slovak. Thanks.--evrik (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: as you can see, I provided the citations, so I have no idea what he wants. buidhe 04:13, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Looking at the hooks above, I see no sources. --evrik (talk) 04:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- evrik, what matters is whether the sources are in the article where the text relevant to the hooks are, backing up the facts in the proposed hooks. It is not a requirement that these be duplicated in the hook listings here, just a nicety (though Buidhe has since listed them all just above, stating in her initial reply which is for ALT0, for ALT1, and for ALT2); indeed, some nominations list the sources next to the hooks but don't include them in the relevant article text, which is a problem. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- I came by to review this nomination because it was languishing. While citing the hook may be a nicety, having to hunt to confirm the hook, in wasn't a language I don't read, wasn't working for me. Truthfully, I am not satisfied with any of the hooks, but Alt 2 is the best - though it needs editing to make it punchier and more concise. --evrik (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Maybe this would benefit from another reviewer. buidhe 20:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Doing... Buidhe (talk · contribs), I will do a full review of this nomination, and post here within 24 hours. Thanks in advance for your work. Flibirigit (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
Overall:
Article was moved from draftspace to mainspace on February 23, and nominated within seven days. Length is adequate. Sourcing is complete with good usage of footnotes. Article appears neutral in tone. No plagiarism detected due to foreign language sources. Somes areas were flagged by the Earwig tool, but those were directly attributed quotes which is not plagiarism. All images in the article are properly licensed on the commons. Hooks are interesting to a broad audience, properly cited and mentioned in the article. AGF on sources. QPQ requirement is complete. DYK nomination is passed with no preference of hook.
Flibirigit (
talk) 00:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Article was moved from draftspace to mainspace on February 23, and nominated within seven days. Length is adequate. Sourcing is complete with good usage of footnotes. Article appears neutral in tone. No plagiarism detected due to foreign language sources. Somes areas were flagged by the Earwig tool, but those were directly attributed quotes which is not plagiarism. All images in the article are properly licensed on the commons. Hooks are interesting to a broad audience, properly cited and mentioned in the article. AGF on sources. QPQ requirement is complete. DYK nomination is passed with no preference of hook. Flibirigit (talk) 00:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)