Template:Did you know nominations/Parochial altruism

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset talk 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Article was nominated by a student editor; their last Wikipedia edit was December 10, and their class ended on December 22. They have ignored several pings on their talk page. Given the issues raised here and the number of templates on the article, the nomination is closed per the reviewer.

Parochial altruism

(

)

... that parochial altruism, a concept in social psychology and evolutionary biology, explains why people are often altruistic towards their own social group while displaying hostility towards out-groups? Source: Bernhard, Helen; Fischbacher, Urs; Fehr, Ernst (2006-08-24). "Parochial altruism in humans". Nature. 442 (7105): 912–915. doi:10.1038/nature04981. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 16929297. S2CID 4411945.
- Reviewed:

Created by Monacpsych (talk). Self-nominated at 20:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Parochial altruism; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - There are a lot of floating, unresolved statements lacking citations that have been tagged, including independent lines, as well as page-top WP:V and WP:OR related banners. This is all from a recent failed GA nom, and the tags have been there for almost two weeks now.
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - It seems to be a definition for those familiar with relevant concepts, rather than a hook for a general audience. Does not attempt to intrigue the reader with, for example, how the concept explains what it purports to explain.

QPQ: None required.

Overall:

While DYK criteria are not GA criteria, the GA review revealed that the article is not presently eligible for a DYK hook. There has not been movement to address these considerable issues—the nominator's last edit was on 10 December, well before the GA review started. Rejecting. Remsense留 01:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)