Template:Did you know nominations/Pachycondyla parvula

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Pachycondyla parvula edit

P. parvula fossil
P. parvula fossil

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 20:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, meets core content policies, but doesn't the article say that a rename was only proposed in 2015, with no mention as to whether it was done or not? --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  • The 2015 article by Dlussky et al contains the taxonomic renaming. It is official for the purpose of taxonomic works, its simply called a proposal in taxonomic parlance.--Kevmin § 13:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Okay, thanks for explaining. AGF offline and paywalled sources. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 14:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)