Template:Did you know nominations/Obwarzanek krakowski

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 03:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn

Obwarzanek krakowski

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

An obwarzanek krakowski sprinkled with poppy seeds

• ... that an average of 150,000 braided ring-shaped breads, known as obwarzanki krakowskie (pictured) are sold daily from street carts in Kraków, Poland?

• Reviewed: Bogna Burska

Created by Kpalion (talk). Self-nominated at 22:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC).

• Date, size, refs, hook neutrality, copyvio spotcheck, all fine. But please wait while we reach consensus on talk about article's name. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Piotrus, the discussion about the article's title may still drag on and on, but I believe the article already meets DYK criteria, whether it is moved to a different title at some point in the future or not. — Kpalion^(talk) 10:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

• • • I withdraw my concerns about the name, per consensus on the talk page.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
      • Thank you! — Kpalion^(talk) 08:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
• Given the amount of material copied or closely paraphrased from the (attributed) source, this falls short of length requirements for original prose. I'm also concerned about the hook: the article and the source state that an average of 150,000 are sold daily in Kraków generally - it doesn't specify only from street carts. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • You're right, I've overlooked criterion 2b. I won't be able to expand this article quickly with enough original prose to meet the requirements, so please consider this nomination withdrawn. — Kpalion^(talk) 20:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)