Template:Did you know nominations/Nora Lilian Alcock

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Nora Lilian Alcock

edit

Created by Kjalcock (talk), Redwellie14 (talk). Nominated by Gobonobo (talk) at 09:42, 20 October 2013 (UTC).

  • I don't see unreferenced paragraphs. New, long enough, within policy, no copyvio found via tool, no QPQ necessary as outside nom. Not sure about source reliability. Willing to accept based on domain's affiliation, but the page looks "dodgy". However, please fix close paraphrasing for at least the hook's article sentence ("such a high-level position") before promoting, if it isn't an even larger issue. Please ping me if I don't respond. czar  20:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
I've struck the original hook and provided an alt. The identified instance of close paraphrasing has been addressed ("such a high-level position" is too vague for me to want to reword it). I agree that the 'memorials map' reference appears less than ideal - it would be better to use the source on which it is based, The Biographical Dictionary of Scottish Women. I do not have access to that work, but I've replaced the reference where possible with the International Women in Science reference. Gobōnobō + c 20:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Rephrased main hook, struck ALT as not directly sourced in article (as phrased in article) per 3b. Good to go czar  02:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)