- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 10:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Neutrois edit
Created by Theparties (talk). Self nominated at 11:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC).
- good start but I suspect this isn't 1500 chars yet Victuallers (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed.--Theparties (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
The article has only 806 prose characters, far short of the minimum 1500 required, and it's now two weeks from its initial nomination and review. There needs to be concerted action to bring this article in line with DYK requirements soon: length, neutrality, sourcing (hook and article), close paraphrasing, etc. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- I had been trying to find more sources to add content but to little avail.--Theparties (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sometimes there just isn't enough information available from reliable sources to get an article beyond a stub. It happens. If there aren't more sources, then the article won't be long enough to qualify for DYK, and the nomination should probably be closed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
It has been another week, and no additional information has been added to the article. Closing as unsuccessful; the article remains far too short to meet DYK minimum standards. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
