Template:Did you know nominations/Nemobius sylvestris
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nemobius sylvestris edit
- ... that despite being flightless, wood crickets appeared in 2001 at a site in southern England at which they had previously not been present? Source: "This Wood-cricket population is numerous and has been established on the heathland area for several years. It is undoubtedly a new population. The heathland area at the Centre was originally covered in a failed conifer crop with a dense Rhododendron understory. This type of habitat would have been totally unsuited to the Wood-crickets. The area was cleared in 1993 and has been managed ever since with the aim of restoring a natural heathland habitat to the area. The new Wood-cricket population was first recorded here in 2001."
- Reviewed: Cartwrightia / C. cartwrighti {First of two}
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC).
Ref #2 states that the nearest known habitat to the new site is seven miles away. That fact should be incorporated into the article, and perhaps an alternative hook be proposed: "...appeared in 2001 at a site in southern England seven miles away from the nearest known population?" Other than that, qualifies as New, Is long enough, Hook has a citation, NPOV, and proposer has fulfilled QPQ. David notMD (talk) 23:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- @David notMD: I hadn't noticed the proximity of the nearest previously known site, and I have amended the article. I don't like to use seven miles in the hook, it might be six or it might be eight. I would have thought my proposed hook is still suitable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Good to go. Confirming new article, completed within one week, long enough, hook has a citation, NPOV, and reviewer has fulfulled QPQ. What makes the hook interesting is that a flightless cricket somehow managed to show up in a new location, and prosper. David notMD (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- @David notMD: I hadn't noticed the proximity of the nearest previously known site, and I have amended the article. I don't like to use seven miles in the hook, it might be six or it might be eight. I would have thought my proposed hook is still suitable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
