- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Naviduct
edit- ... that a naviduct can cost over €55 million?
- Reviewed: Derby Black Friary
- Comment: I review more articles than I nominate. Last one reviewed was May 2013.
Created by Wikiwayman (talk). Self nominated at 09:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC).
- The first problems I noticed were that the hook is not directly referenced and two paragraphs are unreferenced. King Jakob C2 01:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Ref #6 shows that the Krabbersgat naviduct cost €55 million before tax, therefore I didn't think I was stretching things too far with my hook wording. I don't want to put too much detail in the hook as it detracts from its "hookiness". I'm trying to find an online ref for the partially-referenced paragraphs (they were not completely un-referenced), otherwise I'll have to use a Dutch-language book source. Perhaps ALT1 would be a compromise once I've sorted the citations? Wikiwayman (talk) 18:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that one naviduct cost over €55,000,000?
- ALT 1 is better. However, one paragraph is still unreferenced and another is almost unreferenced. King Jakob C2 21:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- I've now tidied up the text so that it is covered by online references without deleting anything of importance. Wikiwayman (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
