Template:Did you know nominations/Nasif al-Nassar

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Nasif al-Nassar

edit

Created by Al Ameer son (talk). Self-nominated at 17:55, 22 July 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, nicely written and well sourced (I've made a few minor copyedits to fix issues). The hook fact is interesting and is cited to a reliable source. I'm happy to sign this one off. Prioryman (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Prioryman, the review doesn't mention policy issues such as neutrality and close paraphrasing, and also doesn't contain the requisite icon to indicate final approval or things to work on. Can you please complete your review? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Sorry I omitted that. Neutrality looks fine to me, and I've not been able to identify any close paraphrasing (the dup detector seems to be down) but spot checks haven't revealed any problems. Prioryman (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)