- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Nano Riantiarno edit
- ... that Nano Riantiarno wrote "operas" about white snakes, cockroaches, and constipation?
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 13:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Sanzo Nosaka
- Metaphorically, but the context is not in the article. How about ALT1 "... that Nano Riantiarno's "opera" titles include white snakes, cockroaches, and constipation?"
- Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:08, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- It seems less syntactically and semantically pleasing (I think it's the irregular use of "include"). Something like:
- ALT2: ... that Nano Riantiarno's works include the Cockroach Opera, the White Snake Opera, and the Constipation Opera?
- --Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Having Opera so many times seems pointless. How about ALT3 ... that Nano Riantiarno's works include the Cockroach, White Snake, and Constipation "operas"? Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think that's good. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed excessive "the"s from ALT3. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think that's good. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Having Opera so many times seems pointless. How about ALT3 ... that Nano Riantiarno's works include the Cockroach, White Snake, and Constipation "operas"? Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)