Template:Did you know nominations/NSA ANT catalog

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

NSA ANT catalog

Improved to Good Article status by PhotographyEdits (talk). Self-nominated at 10:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC).

  • Note: Changed open source tools to open-source tools. See the link, and "Open source" is a noun, "open-source" is an adjective. Bsoyka (talk) 02:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Article is long enough, recently hit GA (congrats), appears to meet all DYK-relevant criteria including avoidance of plagiarism. Hook is sourced, neutral, short enough, and interesting, but I have one nitpick: there's a tense mismatch between "were" before the comma and "have been" after it. Just needs a reword and we'll be good to go, PhotographyEdits. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 17:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
    @Ezlev: Hi, sorry, but I don't know what I should change to fix the grammar tense. PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
    I'd probably go with "they were implemented". Bsoyka (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
    @Bsoyka: Thanks, done. PhotographyEdits (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
    Looks good! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 19:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)