Template:Did you know nominations/Mutiny at Sucro

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Mutiny at Sucro edit

Created/expanded by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 13:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: St James' Church, Daisy Hill
Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) AGF Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) AGF Crisco 1492 (talk)


  • I'd change "consider" to "considered" in the hook to clarify that you're referring to people who actually lived in antiquity (rather than present-day oldsters). I'd also lose the unnecessary "as". Deor (talk) 16:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Changed hook per Deor's suggestion.--Doug Coldwell talk 18:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Most of the article has the citations at the end of the paragraph they support. Could you put them at the end of the sentences/information supported? AGF on offline sources, online sources are PD or behind paywall. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)