- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mimodactylus
Mimodactylus reconstruction
- ... that Mimodactylus (reconstruction pictured) is the first complete pterosaur from the Afro-Arabian continent? Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-54042-z
- ALT1: ... that Mimodactylus (reconstruction pictured) is thought to have fed on crustaceans, unlike most pterosaurs? Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-54042-z
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by FunkMonk (talk) and Elias Ziade (talk). Nominated by FunkMonk (talk) at 21:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mimodactylus; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- In process of reviewing this one. Hog Farm Talk 00:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Recent GA by a trusted editor; hooks are interesting and are supported by the sources, when I spot-checked the hook sources noted no copyvio in the hooks. No image in hook so no need to check that. No red flags noted; FunkMonk and Elias Ziade; a QPQ is needed here. Hog Farm Talk 00:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I think this is only my third DYK, so I don't remember the details. When I review another DYK, should it be noted here? Not sure were Elias went, but he has more experience. FunkMonk (talk) 08:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- If this is only your third nomination then you don't need to do a QPQ; however, should you choose to do one anyway, you can mention it here. However, since you aren't required to do a QPQ yet, if you do chose to do a review, you can just save it for later and use it as your QPQ once you reach five nominations and thus need to do one at the sixth. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, I've already started something that could evolve into a review here[1], so will return to it. FunkMonk (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Funk, the QPQ check tool indicates that you had several dyks between 2010 and 2015, is this not right? Hog Farm Talk 10:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I had one for Spinophorosaurus in that period, and last for Cimoliopterus. I think others made DYKs of some of my GAs in the past, perhaps tagging me, but I would have been a "passive" nominator then. Is there a way to see one's nominations? FunkMonk (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron Does your alternate QPQ checker tool still work? The one that checks nominations instead of credits? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: you can always just check which pages they've created in the Template namespace. This seems to be their third nomination :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 18:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron Does your alternate QPQ checker tool still work? The one that checks nominations instead of credits? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I had one for Spinophorosaurus in that period, and last for Cimoliopterus. I think others made DYKs of some of my GAs in the past, perhaps tagging me, but I would have been a "passive" nominator then. Is there a way to see one's nominations? FunkMonk (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Funk, the QPQ check tool indicates that you had several dyks between 2010 and 2015, is this not right? Hog Farm Talk 10:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, I've already started something that could evolve into a review here[1], so will return to it. FunkMonk (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- If this is only your third nomination then you don't need to do a QPQ; however, should you choose to do one anyway, you can mention it here. However, since you aren't required to do a QPQ yet, if you do chose to do a review, you can just save it for later and use it as your QPQ once you reach five nominations and thus need to do one at the sixth. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I think this is only my third DYK, so I don't remember the details. When I review another DYK, should it be noted here? Not sure were Elias went, but he has more experience. FunkMonk (talk) 08:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
it looks like everything is good to go here then. Hog Farm Talk 22:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm, FunkMonk, and Elias Ziade: Both hooks appearance in the article need citations no later than the end of the sentences. Also, how is the image free? It is attributed to Artwork of Julius T. Csotonyi from this source but I before it can be promoted we need to know for sure that it is a free image. I see this on the website: © 2023 Springer Nature Limited. With this legal notice.
Legal notice: Unless otherwise indicated, this Web Site and its contents are the property of Springer Nature Limited
Lightburst (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)- @Hog Farm, FunkMonk, and Elias Ziade: Lightburst (talk) 19:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm, FunkMonk, and Elias Ziade: Both hooks appearance in the article need citations no later than the end of the sentences. Also, how is the image free? It is attributed to Artwork of Julius T. Csotonyi from this source but I before it can be promoted we need to know for sure that it is a free image. I see this on the website: © 2023 Springer Nature Limited. With this legal notice.
- I'll repeat the citations in the specific sentences, then, that part wasn't stated in in the abbreviated version of the instructions. As for the image, it was first published in this 2019 paper, not in 2023, so I don't think later publications have any bearing on the original. Nowhere does the caption or article state that this image has a different licence than the rest of the article and its imagery, it simply names the artist (no "courtesy of" or "copyright of"). FunkMonk (talk) 19:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- The image question seems settled Lightburst (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'll repeat the citations in the specific sentences, then, that part wasn't stated in in the abbreviated version of the instructions. As for the image, it was first published in this 2019 paper, not in 2023, so I don't think later publications have any bearing on the original. Nowhere does the caption or article state that this image has a different licence than the rest of the article and its imagery, it simply names the artist (no "courtesy of" or "copyright of"). FunkMonk (talk) 19:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)