Template:Did you know nominations/Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 12:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.

Improved to Good Article status by Jorahm (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 19:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Micro Star v. FormGen Inc.; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • I have watched lots of other editors come in and make these DYK templates after I've done the work on GA. It is nice to see but I am not sure if I am supposed to comment or if I can even provide any kind of input. I would change a few words to make the DYK comment more accurate:
    ALT2: ... that the video game case Micro Star v. FormGen Inc. affirmed that copyright owners have the exclusive right to make sequels?
    Technically the precedent for this is much older but Micro Star is a more modern case applying it directly to video games. Jorahm (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough. ALT2 short enough and sourced (to an offline source). No maintenance templates detected, no copyright violations detected, no neutrality problems detected. QPQ done. Good to go.--Launchballer 15:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)