Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 02:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Medicalisation of sexuality

(
)

Created by Darcyisverycute (talk). Nominated by Mach61 (talk) at 06:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • @Darcyisverycute: New enough and long enough. Nominator is QPQ-exempt. The hook fact is in article and checks out to quote. Three passages are uncited and need citations to continue this nomination:
    • Because of this broad definition of sexual health, it has been argued to include an optimistic attitude towards sexual relationships and sexuality, and human rights issues such as "the capability to have pleasant and safer sexual practices that are free of violence, coercion, and discrimination".
    • The economic success of Viagra motivated a number of similar product trials and also prompted research into female sexual pharmacotherapy.
    • Blanchard's theories were influential on the development of the DSM-3, DSM-4 and DSM-5.
While it will be hard to do so, there are a few passages (not including some long terms of art and banal phrases) that are just a little too similar to Hectors [1]. The nominator might want to look and see if anything needs changing. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: I've resolved all the CN tags. Is any possible paraphrasing a dealbreaker? Mach61 (talk) 05:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: Is this hook approved? If not, what needs to be done to get it approved? Z1720 (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for missing these pings. The CN fixes are fine. The hook is fine. But the close paraphrasing issues must still be resolved, Mach61 and Z1720. Please review the link above and reword or rephrase areas as needed where there is a lot of overlap. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: the close paraphrasing issue has been resolved. Good to go? Mach61 (talk) 21:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
What's left is terms of art that can't be reworded, so yes. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Apologies I have not edited for a while. I did not receive Sammi Brie's original ping for whatever reason. Are pings in the DYK templates broken, since Sammi didn't see them either? I have left comments at the article's talk page. Darcyisverycute (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Medicalisation_of_sexuality&oldid=1212294043"