Template:Did you know nominations/Media coverage of 2019 India–Pakistan standoff

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Media coverage of 2019 India–Pakistan standoff

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that once the recent India-Pakistan standoff started de-escalating, the media coverage shifted to deciding who won the perception war?  Source: India-Pakistan tensions: Who won the war of perceptions? (Al Jazeera, Indian author) Narendra Modi v Imran Khan: Who won the war of perception?(BBC) India and Pakistan engage in perception war (The Strait Times)
  • ALT1:... that fake videos and misinformation caused further escalation between India and Pakistan during the recent standoff? Source: Social media fake news fans tension between India and Pakistan (Reuters) Fake news & misinformation on Indo-Pak tension flood the social media (The Economic Times)
  • ALT2:... that war-mongering and misinformation spread by the media may have resulted in a paradoxical de-escalation of the recent India-Pakistan standoff. Indian media trumpeting about Pakistani fake news should look in the mirror first (Quartz India)

• QPQ: Barry Sage

Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 23:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC), co-nom by DBigXrayᗙ 12:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC) .

• I would like to withdraw this DYK nom due to lack of time in following it up as well as lack of time for a QPQ. Further the article may need to be merged into 2019 India–Pakistan standoff. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• Since, DiplomatTesterMan is on a wikibreak, I will be taking this DYK forward. The article is notable and is a valid WP:CFORK per WP:SIZERULE. DBigXrayᗙ 12:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
• added Barry Sage as my QPQ. DBigXrayᗙ 09:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

• Full review needed, since the nomination is continuing rather than being withdrawn. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

• Will do. ∯WBG^converse 17:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

• Full review still needed; it's been over two weeks with no review posted. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
• This is a poorly written article on one of the most volatile areas in the encyclopedia. I remain inclined to work on this article and get rid of the UNDUE stuff. ∯WBG^converse 13:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
• @Winged Blades of Godric: Any updates?
• The article seems to have neutrality issues from what I can tell, and has not been worked on at all since being nominated for DYK. WBG had offered to work on the nomination but has been unable to respond despite a ping. Considering the issues, this nomination is now being marked for closure. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 20:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)