Template:Did you know nominations/Mathar Kula Manickam

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Mathar Kula Manickam

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the 1956 Tamil film Mathar Kula Manickam was based on Rabindranath Tagore's novel, The Wreck?

• Reviewed: To follow Abendlied (Rheinberger)

Created by Sangavitamilmani (talk) and Vensatry (talk). Nominated by Vensatry (talk) at 10:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC).

• Some issues found.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 07:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1829 characters
  • ✗ Paragraphs [3] (The ... singers.) in this article lack a citation.
  • ✗ This article has the following issues:
    • {{1950s-Tamil-film-stub}} from creation
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (2.9% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• Some overall issues detected
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 94 characters
  • ✗ Vensatry has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

• The article is new enough and long enough (at 1592 characters). Hook is of appropriate length, interesting and cited to a reliable source. QPQ done, Earwig's Copyvio Detector shows no apparent copyvio. However, there are issues with a couple of other references used in the article. Reference #2 is from a website called spicyonion.com which basically contains user-submitted content. Reference #3, a bare URL, didn't load for me and looks like it is from a movie streaming/downloading site. These two sources are not RS and should be removed along with any information in the article cited to them. Dee03 02:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

• @Dee03: Done, thanks. —Vensatry _(talk) 06:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

• It's good to go now. Dee03 23:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)