Template:Did you know nominations/Marikamba Temple, Sagar

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 23:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Article withdrawn by creator/nominator due to problems finding sufficient sources; other issues also needed work.

Marikamba Temple, Sagar edit

Marikamba Temple, Sagar, Karnataka

Created by Nvvchar (talk). Self nominated at 14:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC).

  • The article was created on 11 August and nominated for DYK on 16 August, thus still within the five-day window. Currently, the prose section is 1,857 charcters long, which exceeds the minimum of 1,500. QPQ is met, and the image is correctly licenced. One problem is that at the moment, the article is not well written; I would say that it is quite confusing to read, and a number of grammatical errors need to be adressed. I think I will find some time for doing a bit of copyediting work over the next few days. Also, I dare say that I don't understand the hook in its current shape, and therefore can't verify it. Is it about one of the images (that is, paintings?) at the temple, or about the foundation myth? In one of the references for the article, [1], it reads "Legend has it that the idol of Marikamba was installed by the Adi Sankaracharya." Could this be worked into a suitable hook? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoxyOrange (talkcontribs) 20:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)‎
  • A friendly reminder to everyone to please sign all DYK review-related posts when they add them. The article is puzzling, with no explanation of the origin of the footprints, which it desperately needs. The new ALT1 is also unclear: were the footprints established by Shankaracharya (in which case, wouldn't they be his rather than the goddess's) or somehow found by him? As ALT1 has no link or explanation that Marikamba (who is spelled as "Mariamma" or "Marikamma" in the article, but not "Marikamba"; is this the same goddess written about in the Mariamman article?) is a goddess, it doesn't work to hook the reader. (Any explanation on how the footprints were preserved?) As noted by FoxyOrange, the article as a whole needs extensive copyediting—this was not successfully addressed in the recent edits—if it is to qualify for DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Since I can not find more references I withdraw this article.--Nvvchar. 17:40, 5 September 2013 (UTC)