Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Windeyer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Margaret Windeyer edit

5x expanded by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 02:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC).

  • New enough (expanded 9/21, nominated 9/24), long enough (expanded from 318 to 1,938 characters), neutral, well cited (though only three sources, but that's fine), no substantial close paraphrasing issues detected (just proper names), hook is long but not too long (189 characters; maybe consider changing "the World's Congress of Representative Women in Chicago in 1893?" to "the 1893 World's Congress of Representative Women in Chicago?" to trim just a bit?), content is interesting, cited in article and in source (ref 1), QPQ done, no image. Good to go! BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 17:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
This works better: more interesting, slightly shorter, cited in article and in ref (#1). Good to go on ALT 1. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 20:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)