Template:Did you know nominations/Malcolm Orme Little

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Malcolm Orme Little

edit

Created by Hamish59 (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 12:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC).

  • The following has been checked in this review by EagerToddler39
  • QPQ not needed as this is not a self-nom
  • Article new enough at time of nomination and long enough at 3417 characters
  • Ran all online sources through duplication detector. Found and corrected only one instance of close paraphrasing. All paragraphs cited inline. Article appears to be written in a neutral tone. Disambiguation and external link verification were ok.
  • Hook is interesting and length is adequate. However the hook is not completely verifiable and his third retirement lacks an inline citation. It was flagged with a citation needed tag. Perhaps footnote [33] could be used here but I don't believe it is adequate.
  • Kindly insert inline citation to verify his third retirement. EagerToddler39 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • When I nominated, I thought it was covered by WP:CALC. Thanks, Matty.007 15:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • My concern is that retirement number three is not verified. Retirement one and two are ok but there is no inline citation that confirms retirement number three thus invoking WP:CALC is not relevant to the area of concern that I raised. EagerToddler39 (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Ref number 31 gives his retirement I think. Thanks, Matty.007 18:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

I have only done one DYK in the past - Manfred von Richthofen (general). I cannot find a direct cite for him retiring three times.

Hamish59 (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Third retirement now cited Jim Sweeney (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
    Everything is in order now. Ok with the original hook. EagerToddler39 (talk) 00:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)