Template:Did you know nominations/Maenan Abbey

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Maenan Abbey edit

  • ... that in 2011, three medieval walls dated to 1282 were found in the grounds at Maenan Abbey whilst workmen were working on the drainage?

Created/expanded by Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 10:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Reviewed Luba Crater Scientific Reserve.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Good length. Well sourced. Hook verified, appropriate. One minor concern - the History section seems to consist mainly of quotes (from PD sources) but these are not indicated as quotes in any way - suggest "" as the simplest. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
    • The references section acknowledges that the article incorporates text from Samuel Lewis. Moswento (talk | contribs) 11:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
  • But doesn't copying old text negate the DYK rule that prose has to be new?--Esemono (talk) 03:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Only if there is not 1500 characters of new content (for a new article) or 5x of new material (for expansions) Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
  • So where does that leave this article? --Esemono (talk) 03:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
  • As this is a new article, are there at least 1500 characters of new (unique to Wikipedia) text? Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)