- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Macrotermitinae
edit- ... that termites developed agriculture some 31 million years ago? Source: "we have recalibrated molecular divergence estimates for the origins of termite agriculture to around 31 Ma,"
- Reviewed: Arjan Hasid
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 14:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC).
- The article is long enough:
- The hook is REALLY interesting:
- The hook is referenced:
- The hook is below 200 characters:
- No (0%) copyvio found with Earwig's tool:
- The article follows most other important policies:
- QPQ:
- The article is a 5-fold expansion in last7 days:
- This is a lovely, short DYK that hits you between the eyes with its hook. Unless I've got it wrong, I think a 5x expansion should result in the article being 10,925 bytes; but its currently only 7,767. If this can be addressed, it will be good to go. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- The article is long enough:
- @Nick Moyes: Thanks for the review. The five-fold expansion refers to the number of characters of readable prose, the bullet pointed list of genera does not count. One can calculate the number of characters with this tool- which gives 661-->3934 - or the page size tool that I have on my dashboard, which makes it 659-->3896. Either way I think it's OK. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Then I'll gladly accept that and add the tool to my list of useful stuff. DYK is therefore good to go. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)