Template:Did you know nominations/MV KPS7 - Karadeniz Powership Ayşegül Sultan, MV Karadeniz Powership Zeynep Sultan

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

MV KPS7 - Karadeniz Powership Ayşegül Sultan, MV Karadeniz Powership Zeynep Sultan edit

Created by CeeGee (talk). Self-nominated at 11:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC).

  • This is an encyclopedia. How common is it for an article about a ship to state its current voyage in the WP:LEAD? Do ship articles keep this kind of content up to date or is this overly detailed for this subject? I am leery of content that will be outdated by the end of the weekend.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Changed lede omitting "Currently".CeeGee 12:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Why are so many measurements presented in both English and metric but the cargo capacity only presented in one of the two?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Because in all ship-related articles I see at WP, the vessel characteristics are given in two different measurement systems but the tonnage. I'll welcome any suggestion by you. CeeGee 12:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  • The articles are free of copyvio.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • The hook is O.K. but I would prefer a hook regarding the elements of the content that are more long-lasting.--23:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • The hook is still long-lasting after almost one month, and it is unlikely that it's gonna be out of date. However, I have no objection if you can come up with a better one. CeeGee 12:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
  • The hook is 190 characters and there are no images to validate for this review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • , if you can't come up with any better hook, I will reconsider this one, but let's try to find something that might still be current by the time this makes the main page.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I would expect that the reviewer notifies me about the problems as suggested by WP:DYK. I thank BlueMoonset for reminding me. CeeGee 12:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)