The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

M.O.N.T

Created by Explicit (talk). Self-nominated at 03:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. Hook is interesting, neutral, and supported by Korean-language source, accepted AGF. QPQ is done. No copyvio found. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 01:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this and have 2 questions. One, isn't there a period after the T in their name, since it's an acronym? Two, there is nothing in the article about the Liancourt Rocks being "disputed". Frankly, I thought that was the most interesting part of the hook, and clicked on the article to see why they are disputed. Please add something with a source. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Explicit: thanks. Is any of the information you added about the dispute in the source you cited? Yoninah (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • The Liancourt Rocks dispute between South Korea and Japan is so high profile that I think it falls under WP:BLUE. -Zanhe (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. Restoring tick per Zanhe's review. Yoninah (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)