Template:Did you know nominations/Lytechinus pictus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Lytechinus pictus edit

(

)

... that aggregations of painted urchin have been recorded with a density of 80 individuals per square metre?

Reviewed: Bazoline Estelle Usher

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The source in the article next to the hook references pages 473 to 480, while the claim actually stated in the hook is found on page 477. You should cite to that specific page in the article, not just the range. If the preceding sentence is cited within that range, then it should cite a specific page. Ergo Sum 15:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Ergo Sum: I have rearranged the citations so that the page numbers are more specific. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Good to go. Ergo Sum 18:33, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I came by to promote this, but there is a missing URL note in footnote 5. Yoninah (talk) 19:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Yoninah: Added. Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Restoring tick per Ergo Sum's review. Yoninah (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)