Template:Did you know nominations/Luna moth

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Luna moth edit

Male Luna moth
Male Luna moth
  • ... that the Luna moth (pictured) is the only moth ever featured on a US postage stamp? Ref #15 Butterflies and Ref #16 Luna moth
    • ALT1:... that the long tails on the hindwings of Luna moths (pictured) are thought to interfere with echolocation used by bats to locate prey? Refs #3 (Lee) and #4 (Barber)
    • ALT2:... that the Luna moth (pictured) was named Actias luna after the Roman goddess of the moon by Carl Linnaeus in 1758? Ref #1 Tuskes

Improved to Good Article status by David notMD (talk). Self-nominated at 01:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC).

  • Well-written article, promoted to GA within 7 days of DYK nom. The first hook is very interesting, but neither cited source specifically states it is the only moth ever featured on a US stamp. Alt1 hook checks out OK. The image is striking and easily discernible at 100px, but I have a concern about its copyright status: although stated as "own work" with a free cc-by-sa 4.0 license, a TinEye check shows it on several Internet websites a year ago. Can you explain?  JGHowes  talk 23:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
  • The butterfly citation shows all US stamps that show butterflies or moths, and Luna moth is the only moth.David notMD (talk) 00:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Definitely a photo taken by me. In 2013 I posted it to my blog: http://www.maynardlifeoutdoors.com/2013/05/. This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. If that is not appropriate, I will remove the photo from the article, replace it with a photo from Wikipedia Commons, and use that for the DYK. I am not aware of other usage. David notMD (talk) 00:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Photo OK, AGF for ownership. A cc-NC-ND license is not allowable at Commons, but cc-by-sa 4.0 as you've licensed it at Commons, is.  JGHowes  talk 03:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)