- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Lots of Mommies
- ... that there is disagreement about whether Lots of Mommies, in which a girl is raised by four mothers, should be considered an LGBTQ picture book? Source: Crisp 2010: "Although it is not ambiguous for Horning, in actuality, it is the semiotics that establish the text as queer. [...] While it may be easy to see why Lots of Mommies has not been counted as an LGBTQ picture book..."; Peel 2015: "and Lots of Mommies, which I still don’t agree is about a lesbian family because there’s nothing explicit there that shows that any of them are lesbians. I mean they’re living in a commune, and they have interesting names. But you know there’s nothing that says that any of them are a couple."
Moved to mainspace by Bobamnertiopsis (talk). Self-nominated at 21:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is new enough, long enough and well sourced. Hook is cited and interesting. Since qpq is done and there's no copyvio, this one looks all set. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
To
T:DYK/P5
Article is new enough, long enough and well sourced. Hook is cited and interesting. Since qpq is done and there's no copyvio, this one looks all set. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)