Template:Did you know nominations/List of bishops of Macau

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 ^talk 09:58, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues

List of bishops of Macau

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that who were/are the bishop of Macau?

Created by Sdee (talk). Self nominated at 16:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC).

• This list is long enough and has been created on the indicated day. The picture has a suitable license for placement on the main page. There are a couple of issues here, however:
  1. The nominator already has 5 DYK credits and thus needs to review someone else's nomination.
  2. The hook, IMHO, is not suitable. Not only is it ungrammatical, but it is not a fact from the article. Maybe someone wants to suggest something?
  3. If a picture should accompany this nomination, then the hook should say what/who is pictured here.
  4. The article needs a review for English grammar, style, and flow of prose. It also needs to be wikified by a friendly gnome; the remarks for instance should be in the table, not in an 'appendix', and the dates should have the recommended formatting. The table is currently hard to read. --Pgallert (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

• I hope someone can assist me with more in details as i am new to write in english articles.--TINHO (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

• It appears that Ohconfucius did some cleanup at the end of April, but the article is currently 1484 prose characters, which is too short for DYK. Also, as Pgallert notes, the current hook is not usable. If no one does come forward to assist TINHO further, which would include adding material, creating a new hook, and addressing any remaining issues raised above, then I don't see this nomination being able to succeed. I think we need to see at least the start of fixes within the next week. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

• I would love to see at least a review of another nomination; that's necessary, and that's something Tinho needs to do themselves. Willing to help with other issues after that. --Pgallert (talk) 07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

• Tinho hasn't edited on Wikipedia since May 11, and we still have an unsuitable hook, a too-short article, no QPQ, and no other action. Under the circumstances, I think it's time to close this. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)