Template:Did you know nominations/Leucophoenicite

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Leucophoenicite

edit

Created/expanded by Chris857 (talk). Self nom at 20:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Hooks: Good to go, cited and short enough (AGF on offline source for first hook). Prefer ALT1, but all are okay.
Article: New enough, long enough, referencing well done, no close paraphrasing against this or this.
Summary: Good to go, AGF on offline sources. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:05, 8 July 2012 (UTC)