- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: by Miyagawa (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tsarap River edit
- ... that a landslide dam (pictured) on the Tsarap River in Ladakh formed an upstream lake of 14 kilometres (8.7 mi)?
- Reviewed: To the Youth in Europe and North America
- Comment: A failed to be ITN Candidate.
Created by Mehrajmir13 (talk). Self nominated at 05:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC).
The picture was taken by NASA and is therefore public domain. The article is long enough, is neutral and within policy. I'm assuming this website stole Wikipedia's content, not the other way around. Mehrajmir13 did expand the article fivefold but it was over the period of two and a half-years. The QPQ was done although not very thorough. The hook (166 characters) is short enough. I think there was a mistake in using {{Convert}} because according to the article, the lake was 14 miles, not kilometers, long. To that end the hook appears in the article but the citation says the lake was only half that size. I assume the hook has bolded a link to a section of the article because Tsarap River was already a DYK in 2012 and therefore ineligible. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- The Landslide Dam is a {{Current Event}}. It was nominated for DYK well within the five days of its creation. It's an article by itself. Counting it with the article is not fair, though it will give you a twofold expansion at the time of nomination. It was previously nominated at ITN Candidate. {{Convert}} template fixed as per the reference. MehrajMir (talk) 04:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- No, Landslide dam is an article by itself. Tsarap River#Landslide Dam is not. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
