Template:Did you know nominations/La Pacana

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

La Pacana edit

Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 17:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC).

  • Article is new, long, hook is sourced (and interesting!). The article is well sourced and neutral.
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector gives a " Violation Unlikely" (39.8% confidence) result.
  • , its ready for DYK. Lappspira (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
  • @Jo-Jo Eumerus: what do you think of saying "spewed 2,451–3,500 cubic kilometres of rock" to remove the repetition of "eruption...erupted"? Also, do you have a conversion template for the measurement? Yoninah (talk) 01:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Something like this? I am not sure how many readers of the main page need Imperial units. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks, and I agree that the conversion template just clutters things up. Restoring tick per Lappspira's review. Yoninah (talk) 21:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)