- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Kill zone edit
- ... that a successful military ambush may take less than a minute to neutralize every soldier in the kill zone?
- Reviewed: Teungku Chik di Tiro
Created/expanded by Binksternet (talk). Self nom at 04:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Hook, source, date, and length look good. "A well-executed ambush may..." sounds pretty similar to the cited source, but I'm not sure if this constitutes an issue (not adept at paraphrasing concerns). You could rephrase that sentence into what the hook says (i.e. use "successful"). Ruby 2010/2013 03:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Looks good! Ruby 2010/2013 15:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I used the word successful in place of well-executed. Binksternet (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)