Template:Did you know nominations/Khizr and Ghazala Khan

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Khizr and Ghazala Khan

edit
Khizr and Ghazala Khan
Khizr and Ghazala Khan

Created by Rhododendrites (talk). Self-nominated at 17:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Just a brief comment on the hooks. I wasn't sure if I wanted to nominate it for DYK at first, because a polemic hook seemed inevitable. Then these bits about the pocket Constitutions came out, which is both interesting and about as neutral as one can get with this subject. I'm not opposed to other sorts of hooks, but my preference will be to stay away from e.g. quotes from the speech or quotes from Trump. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Some issues found

  • Article was created on 1 Aug and nominated for DYK on 5 Aug 2016.
  • Article has not featured on ITN or previously appeared as a "qualifying article" in DYK.
  • Article is long enough.
  • Article has appropriate citations.
  • Article hook is within the specified limit.
  • Article hook is properly sourced by this link.
  • Article has outstanding copyvio template.
  • Article does not violate BLP.
  • Article has copyvio issues. Text seems to be copy+pasted from this source.
  • Article is neutral.
  • This is nominator's 9th nomination. QPQ is done.

Nominator is required to address the issues. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:52, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@AKS.9955: Looks like you found a site that copies Wikipedia articles. That article looks to be a mashup of our page and this NPR piece. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
...Just to state unequivocally: there is no copy/pasting going on. You can see the evolution of the text in the article history, of course. The Citizen looks to have plagiarized Wikipedia (and NPR). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
  • In view of the clarification above, giving green tick mark to the DYK nomination. Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. Hook ok and properly sourced. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 19:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)