- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Khaplu Palace edit
... that UNESCO Asia Pacific Heritage Awards awarded Khaplu Palace (pictured) in northern Pakistan the "Award for Distinction" in 2013?
5x expanded by Smsarmad (talk). Self nominated at 21:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC).
- Will be doing the QPQ review tomorrow. --SMS Talk 21:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Reviewed: List of Pakistan Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut --SMS Talk 08:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1:
... that UNESCO Asia Pacific Heritage Awards awarded the recently restored Khaplu Palace (pictured) in northern Pakistan the "Award for Distinction" in 2013? - --SMS Talk 21:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- 5x expansion article started with ~1100 words on 9 September 2013, and at the time of nomination on 14 September, had ~5075 words, falling only slightly under. The article has since been expanded to well over 6000 words, so I think it makes sense to pass it on the 5x criteria. (Also, for some reason, prosesize.js is not working for me so my initial estimates may be off somewhat). Length is certainly fine. A spot check of sources show no signs of plagiarism or close paraphrasing. As this article is about a business, the article is importantly, non-promotional in tone. The hook is interesting and appropriately sourced. Photos used in the article were obtained from Flickr and were released under an appropriate CC license. I think the phrasing in ALT1 is fine, but here is another hook to consider:
- ALT2: ... that the site for the UNESCO Asia Pacific Heritage Award-winning Khaplu Palace (pictured) was based on where a large rock ended up after being rolled down a cliff?
Will need a reviewer to check ALT2. I, JethroBT drop me a line 19:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- 5x expansion article started with ~1100 words on 9 September 2013, and at the time of nomination on 14 September, had ~5075 words, falling only slightly under. The article has since been expanded to well over 6000 words, so I think it makes sense to pass it on the 5x criteria. (Also, for some reason, prosesize.js is not working for me so my initial estimates may be off somewhat). Length is certainly fine. A spot check of sources show no signs of plagiarism or close paraphrasing. As this article is about a business, the article is importantly, non-promotional in tone. The hook is interesting and appropriately sourced. Photos used in the article were obtained from Flickr and were released under an appropriate CC license. I think the phrasing in ALT1 is fine, but here is another hook to consider:
