- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kendra Pierre-Louis
Created/expanded by Sadads (talk). Self-nominated at 13:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC). Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Kandy Tuskers in 2020
- i'll review this Mujinga (talk) 15:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
QPQ: 
- ?
Overall: 
I'd say the QPQ review is still in progress, since you haven't addressed all five of the Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria. For the rest, hook is quirky and article is ok, the first sentence in "career" has five references on it and one is doubled. Mujinga (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
@Mujinga: Not sure what you mean by QPQ not done: Template:Did you know nominations/Kandy Tuskers in 2020 -- I made a mistake and another editor gave additional feedback (see User_talk:Sadads#Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Kandy_Tuskers_in_2020 -- it seems to be just fine, in terms of getting worked out....Sadads (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- hiya what i meant is "the review must address all five criteria listed here" on Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria and i don't see the review addressing the length of the article, its newness, copyvio check etc. maybe you did all of this, but i'm not seeing it. if you use the template then it's more clear to me. hope that helps. Mujinga (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- That has never been part of the process... I have been doing dyks for ten years ... I don't know what you are asking for -- I said it passed, the concern from the other editor was clarity of the hook, not that the criteria was wrong. I am very confused by what that would effect by QPQ, Sadads (talk) 17:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sadads: a QPQ review should explicitly confirm that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Your review only confirmed that the hook fact was verified (I think). An optional Reviewer's Template is located above the edit window. Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- I said it passed the review with the DYKtick, that means I confirmed all 5 criteria .... you don't have to explicit state that in the template... again been doing this for 10 years, you are insisting on process which simply isn't in the playbook. Sadads (talk)
- @Sadads: sorry to say, but you have not been doing QPQs for 10 years because they haven't been in force for so long. The QPQ requirement specifically states: Qualifying QPQs need to be full reviews, and not simply a "check mark." To acknowledge your good faith effort, I'm happy to donate a QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Hermann Schey. Next time, please list the criteria you checked. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks to Yoninah for the courtesy. Mujinga (talk) 23:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- ?
I'd say the QPQ review is still in progress, since you haven't addressed all five of the Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria. For the rest, hook is quirky and article is ok, the first sentence in "career" has five references on it and one is doubled. Mujinga (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
@Mujinga: Not sure what you mean by QPQ not done: Template:Did you know nominations/Kandy Tuskers in 2020 -- I made a mistake and another editor gave additional feedback (see User_talk:Sadads#Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Kandy_Tuskers_in_2020 -- it seems to be just fine, in terms of getting worked out....Sadads (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
