- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Karen Saywitz edit
- ... that Karen Saywitz developed guidelines for interviewing child witnesses and victims? ( Source: Goodman, G., & Bottoms, B. (June 2018) Retrieved May 21, 2019 from https://www.apadivisions.org/division-37/publications/newsletters/advocate/2018/06/legacy
Moved to mainspace by QuakerQuaker765 (talk). Nominated by QuakerSquirrel (talk) at 14:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC).
- Article was created in user space on May 14, but moved to the main space on May 21
- Nominator reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/George Beauchamp (RMS Titanic) QuakerSquirrel (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
@QuakerSquirrel: This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and a QPQ has been done. However, it is a copyright violation of this site and this site as you can see from this printout. The article needs to be substantially rewritten using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. I’m busy with some other projects for a bit, but I will get back to this in a bit and fix these issues. QuakerSquirrel (talk) 20:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
- I've removed the copyright material from the article. Another problem: the content in the "Research" section does not appear to be supported by the citation provided.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:21, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: thanks so much for rewriting the article while I was away. I've changed the citation that you flagged as an issue & also rewrote some more of the article to avoid copyright violations. @Cwmhiraeth: does it look OK now? QuakerSquirrel (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
As far as I can see, this article is now acceptable and the nomination meets DYK criteria. The hook facts are cited inline in the "Further work" section. I would suggest subdividing the opening paragraph by having a career section separate from the lead section, but that is not a DYK requirement. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
