Template:Did you know nominations/Kansas House Bill 2453
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kansas House Bill 2453
edit- ... that Kansas House Bill 2453 has been characterized as "... a subtle effort to deprive same-sex couples of government benefits, by allowing bigoted government workers to simply refuse them service"?
- ALT1:... that Kansas House Bill 2453 allows for people to deny same-sex couples service under the purview of religious liberty?
- Reviewed: Thorvald A. Solberg
- Comment: Either hook works, so I really do not mind which one is chosen.
Created by Ktr101 (talk), Sportfan5000 (talk). Nominated by Ktr101 (talk) at 14:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC).
The first hook is a swipe at the bill, but our readers will include some who wish the bill to pass, so I do not recommend the first hook. Plenty of online sources support the article and the second hook. I see no problems with too-close paraphrasing or copying. I deleted a fact-challenged sentence so that no maintenance templates would be present. The second hook and article are of the proper length, with good referencing.- I'm going to offer a copyedited version of ALT1, because I think "people" is not precise. Binksternet (talk) 23:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- ALT2:... that Kansas House Bill 2453 would allow service providers in Kansas to refuse service to same-sex couples under the purview of religious liberty?
- Works for me! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
