Template:Did you know nominations/Kakusan-ni

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Kakusan-ni

Created by Cielquiparle (talk). Self-nominated at 00:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC).

  • Hi Cielquiparle (talk), review follows: article created 30 December and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; sources used are largely offline/subscription only but happy to AGF there has been no overly close paraphrasing from them (Earwig is clear); hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and cited, AGF on offline sourcing; a QPQ has been carried out; I added one "who?" tag to a bit citing "recent historians", but won't hold up approval over that - Dumelow (talk) 08:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Dumelow. I have now named the historians, and it does read better. Re: the book sources, the things that Earwig would flag if it could scan them are the direct quotes from the kōan attributed to Kakusan-ni, the short verse she wrote, and the short verse written on the occasion of her tonsure, but I've included citations for those and formatted them so that it's clear. Cielquiparle (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
I checked this one out and AGF on the hook reference. I think it is ready tom promote when a slot opens. Bruxton (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)