The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

KNUE

5x expanded by Dma37dude (talk) and Sammi Brie (talk). Nominated by Sammi Brie (talk) at 06:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC).

  • Article was expanded 5 times at the time of nomination. It is neutrally worded, more than 1,500 characters of prose, and uses inline citations. Earwig found no copyright violations or paraphrasing issues. A QPQ is not needed for Dma37dude as this is his first nomination; however, Sammi Brie is listed as one of the co-authors and I'm wondering if it's necessary for Sammi Brie to have done a QPQ. lullabying (talk) 07:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Sammi Brie, it looks like lullabying was blocked for only 24 hours over 11 hours ago, so they'll be able to return to complete the review almost before you know it. This can wait until they're back. As far as the QPQ, since Sammie Brie is listed as participating in the expansion and they voluntarily nominated the article, they are indeed correct in providing the QPQ: it is always the nominator's responsibility based on how many credits they have (and Sammie Brie has many), regardless of whether another significant editor has fewer than five DYK credits or not. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
    • and welcome to Dma37dude! always nice to have new nominators :)
QPQ has completed; this is good to go. lullabying (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Lullabying! Since they approved the nom instead of me, I'll promote it. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 01:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P7