- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
KNAU
5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 09:12, 6 May 2022 (UTC).
- Starting this review shortly. Ktin (talk) 02:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Meets eligibility criteria based on a manual check 1412 * 5. Article is well sourced. Neutral in tone. Earwig shows no issues. Both hooks are sourced to local newspapers from the Arizona region. Both hooks are interesting. QPQ done. Marking both hooks approved. Despite the caveat as noted by Sammi in their comments section, I think ALT0 looks good and is hooky for sure. Also, congratulations on the #500! Ktin (talk) 03:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Meets eligibility criteria based on a manual check 1412 * 5. Article is well sourced. Neutral in tone. Earwig shows no issues. Both hooks are sourced to local newspapers from the Arizona region. Both hooks are interesting. QPQ done. Marking both hooks approved. Despite the caveat as noted by Sammi in their comments section, I think ALT0 looks good and is hooky for sure. Also, congratulations on the #500! Ktin (talk) 03:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)