The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 20:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

KFYI

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 17:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC).

  • Article long enough, and new enough as acquired GA status within time proscribed. Neutrally written, with a plethora of inline citations. No copyvio detected by myself or Earwig's tool (the lone hit is a wikipedia theft site I wouldn't be brave enough to click on). Hook is within format and is compelling, facts in hook are in article (if severely truncated) and directly supported by inline citations. QPQ complete, no image. Deserving of mainpage exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 23:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)