- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
John S. Palmore
edit- ... that, during his 23-year career on the Kentucky Court of Appeals and the Kentucky Supreme Court, John S. Palmore authored over 800 judicial opinions?
- ALT1:... that, although expected to lose, Commonwealth's attorney John S. Palmore won re-election in 1956 after securing a conviction in a high-profile murder trial in Henderson, Kentucky?
- Reviewed: Hydraulic Press Channel
Created by Acdixon (talk). Self-nominated at 16:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC).
- Review by Maile
- QPQ
- June 8, 2016 QPQ review by Acdixon has not been used as a QPQ on any previous nomination
- Eligibility
- Article created in Draft space by BD2412 on August 24, 2015
- Article moved from Draft:John S. Palmore on June 7, 2016 and has 5434 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
- Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
- Sourcing
- Every paragraph sourced inline, both online and offline
- Citations are appropriately formatted
- No bare URLs
- Hook
- Hook is 149 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
- ALT1 hook is 179 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
- Image
- No image used
- Tools
- Earwig's tool shows no concerns
- Labs Duplication Detector run on each individual online source shows no issues of concern
- External links are working links, and are not redirects
- Dab solver says there are no disambiguation links in the article
This nomination passes, AGF on offline sourcing. An interesting aside that is not part of the article, is in the source for the ALT1 hook. That being, the city's 1956 first-ever screening of African Americans and women in the jury pool. And while one black man passed, none of the women made it through the questioning of potential jurors. How far we have come! — Maile (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)