Template:Did you know nominations/John Bailey Shelton

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

John Bailey Shelton

edit

Created/expanded by Mum's taxi (talk). Nominated by Rock drum (talk) at 09:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Date, hook and source all check out. Ready to go! Nice work on a significant subject. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

  • I'm concerned that some of the phrasing in this article might be too close to that of its sources. Compare for example "As a result, he built up a considerable collection of historical items" with "As a result he built up a considerable collection of historic items". Nikkimaria (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
    I've fixed the one you pointed out but I couldn't see any other obvious close-phrasing between the article and sources. Regards, Rock drum Ba-dumCrash 17:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
I have compared the article to the online sources with the "Duplicate detector" and I consider the article is now acceptable. It has been in limbo too long! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)