Template:Did you know nominations/Japanese export porcelain
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Japanese export porcelain edit
Dish 1660-70
- ... that from 1660 to 1700, the majority of Japanese porcelain was made to be exported (example pictured)? "... the vast majority of production was for export", Lerner, Martin, Blue and White Early Japanese Export Ware, para 2 of "The Arita Export Porcelain Industry", 1978, Metropolitan Museum of Art, full view, no page numbers
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 00:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC).
- Vastly more than 5x expansion, began 8/22, with expansion ongoing, so AFAIK it meets the timeframe
- First section alone meets length reqs.
- Neutral/well written, passes Earwig bot check
- Hook is fine, sourced
- QPQ done
- Image is Public Domain
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Edwardx and Johnbod: Saw your edits back and forth and IMO, yes, it's better with a comma after 1700. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, added back. Bet the "errors" tinkerers take it out again though. Johnbod (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- No, the comma is accepted. Congratulations! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Of late, I have been tweaking/trimming a lot of hooks early on in the nomination process, to hopefully reduce issues at WP:ERRORS further down the line, and had not even noticed tweaking this one twice. Edwardx (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- And well played to you! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Of late, I have been tweaking/trimming a lot of hooks early on in the nomination process, to hopefully reduce issues at WP:ERRORS further down the line, and had not even noticed tweaking this one twice. Edwardx (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- No, the comma is accepted. Congratulations! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, added back. Bet the "errors" tinkerers take it out again though. Johnbod (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Edwardx and Johnbod: Saw your edits back and forth and IMO, yes, it's better with a comma after 1700. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
