Template:Did you know nominations/In Your Own Sweet Way

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 20:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

In Your Own Sweet Way

edit

Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Martinevans123 (talk), Bonkers The Clown (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 14:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC) Reviewed Zuber Usman.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

  • This article does not reach the 1,500-character minimum; current prose size is 1.3k. Also, the second paragraph probably needs some rewriting. Also, the non-free image is not true visual aid for the song itself, and I don't know whether using a cover art of the 2007 compilation is exceptional. --George Ho (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
  • I wonder if the article is mergable into the album Brubeck Plays Brubeck. Otherwise, I could be wrong. Look at Queens of Noise; details of songs are enough as part of the article instead of small stand-alones. --George Ho (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Its a jazz standard, of course it meets criteria for having its own article.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 19:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
  • I can find no trace of this song ever having been released as a single (a cover of which might have provided the ideal article image). But I guess the use of the song title as the name for the whole album points to its increased significance as a classic in its own right. Another CD, issued in 2004 by Jamey Aebersold, with a play-along instructional book, has the same title, but a total of 13 tracks: [1]. The cover image is not quite as strong, but perhaps could be used as an alternative. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Second paragraph was copyedited by me. Article reached the 1,500-character minimum, but my copyediting decreased prose size. Prose size, nevertheless, is still over the minimum. Unsure still about the non-free image, but I hope another reviewer considers it an exception per WP:NFCC. Because some articles tended to be overbloated in order to reach the minimum requirements, I hope this article is not considered overbloated in another review. --George Ho (talk) 00:46, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
  • A sample clip of the actual melody would be nice. And mention of any recorded version with the lyric is probably essential - most, if not all, of Brubeck's own versions are instrumental. After all, it is a song, not just a tune. There are some YT versions, but links there are not too popular, are they. Martinevans123 (talk) 00:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Meets 5-day window, prose size is over 1500 char, interesting and reasonably complete, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen, QPQ satisfied. The licensing information for the non-free image explains that it is low-resolution and for informational purposes only. Since the image is not appearing on the main page, I don't see a problem with it. I added another cite to the hook ref, since the one used was offline. Hook ref verified and good to go. Yoninah (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)