Template:Did you know nominations/Humor styles

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Humor styles

edit
  • ... that individuals who report high levels of affiliative humor are more likely to initiate friendships?

Created/expanded by Majobc11 (talk). Self nom at 14:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

  • This one has potential, but I've tagged for several issues. Needs to be cleaned up. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
I cleaned up the article a bit: I added a lead and section headers and another relevant wikilink. I also tried to re-write a few things in a more encyclopedic style. Let me know what you think and if there are any other areas for improvement. Can I re-nominate this improved article for DYK? Majobc11 (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
  • It's still nominated for DYK :-) It will not be "unnominated" unless someone fails it. The blue slash is to indicate there are fairly severe issues which need work before this can be promoted. I'll give a proofread. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Hook: interesting enough, short enough, assuming good faith (AGF) on offline reference.
Article: New enough... acceptably long enough, although for a subject this big more would be preferable. Referencing is thorough enough for DYK purposes. AGF on offline sources, as I cannot access them.
Alright, this looks good to go! Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2012 (UTC)