Template:Did you know nominations/How to Be Single (film)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 11:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

How to Be Single (film) edit

(

)

... that Drew Barrymore was previously set to direct the upcoming film How to Be Single, but is now just producing?

ALT1:... that the upcoming film How to Be Single is based on the Liz Tuccillo's debut novel of same name?
QPQ: 2015 DFB-Pokal Final

Created by Captain Assassin! (talk). Self-nominated at 08:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC).

A stub (barely 500 characters) with only one sentence that is referenced. Half of ALT0 isn't even mentioned in the article and neither hook is referenced. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 12:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

@Jakec: Will you please wait a couple of days, so I can expand it? Actually I nominated five other articles and I'm expanding all now. Thank you. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 03:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

@Jakec: Expanded, hook rephrased. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 17:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Okay, though I strongly suggest your bring your articles up to scratch before nominating them for DYK. That aside, ALT1 does verify, though it seems a bit dry ;-). With regards to ALT0, the article says that Barrymore was first set to produce, but then was set to direct. It does say that someone else took over the role of director, but doesn't say that Barrymore was going back to producing. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 19:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

QPQ? czar ⨹ 19:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

@Czar: QPQ done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 03:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Full review needed now that QPQ has been supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Long and new enough, within policy, spot checks reveal no copyvios, QPQ done. Hooks within policy and good to go. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 21:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I see that my concerns about both hooks were never addressed. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 22:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

The part about Barrymore still producing is now in the article and cited to a source. I actually think that ALT1 is the more interesting of the two, but I suppose it's up to the closer's taste of which one to take. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 20:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)