Template:Did you know nominations/Horse Protection Act of 1970
The following is an archived discussion of Horse Protection Act of 1970's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Horse Protection Act of 1970 edit
- ... that the Horse Protection Act of 1970 was designed to eliminate soring, but inspectors still find hundreds of violations each year?
Created/expanded by Dana boomer (talk). Self nominated at 14:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC).
- Article - expansion started on 15 March, was 449 characters, now 9202 characters of readable prose, so long enough with more than x20 expansion; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected running random refs through duplication detector (earwig is playing up for me this morning); I've re-assessed as start class.
- Hook - within length criteria at 131 characters; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #15 in final paragraph of 'Impact' section; and intriguing. Incredibly there are still over 580 violations of this detected!
- QPQ done; no image.
Everything looks fine. SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review! Dana boomer (talk) 12:23, 18 March 2013 (UTC)